A leaked Geekbench listing for AMD's unreleased 'Medusa Point' Zen 6 APU shows a 10-core engineering sample beating the current Ryzen AI 9 365 (Strix Point) by nearly 35% in multi-core. That's a real listing with a real score. It's also not the full story.

16,555 pts

Medusa Point ES multi-core

Geekbench, leaked engineering sample

5,370 MHz

Peak clock observed

~300MHz above the Strix Point comparison

+29% single-core, +22% multi-core

At matched 2.0GHz clock

the architecture-isolated numbers

2027

Expected launch

details expected at CES 2027

The comparison everyone's headline skips

The 35% figure compares the Medusa Point sample at its highest observed clock against Strix Point chips running roughly 300MHz slower. Some of that lead is just clock speed, not architecture. The more honest number comes from the same leak's earlier data point: at a fixed, deliberately-lowered 2.0GHz on both chips, Medusa Point was 29% faster single-core and 22% faster multi-core than Strix Point at the identical clock — smaller numbers, but they isolate what's actually IPC (architecture) gain from what's just 'ran it faster.'

Why engineering samples always look better than they'll ship

Leaked ES silicon is cherry-picked and unrepresentative by nature — an early bin, tested without the thermal and power constraints of an actual shipping laptop chassis, roughly a year and a half before the 2027 launch window with a full generation of firmware and yield maturity still ahead. None of that makes the leak fake. It means '35% faster' is a lab-sample ceiling, not a number a 2027 laptop buyer should expect to actually see.

  • Check whether the comparison controls for clock speed before trusting a percentage gain — an uncontrolled clock advantage inflates the number for free.
  • Note how far out the actual launch is — more runway means more room for the real number to move, in either direction.
  • Treat a single leaked Geekbench result as a signal of architecture direction, not a spec sheet you should plan a purchase around.

The genuinely interesting part of this leak is the IPC-isolated numbers — 29% and 22% at matched clock is real architectural progress from AMD, worth watching. It's just not the headline number that's actually going around.