Start with the number that should reframe how you think about local AI: Qwen3.6-27B, a free open-weight model that fits on a single 24GB graphics card, scores 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified — within about four points of Claude Opus 4.6 (80.8), a frontier model you rent by the token. That's genuinely remarkable. It's also not the whole story, because there is no single 'best' 24GB model in 2026. There's a clean three-way split, and picking right depends entirely on what you're doing.
77.2 SWE-bench
Qwen3.6-27B
coding king; ~15-17GB at Q4
76.9 MMMU-Pro
Gemma 4 31B
vision + general; ~18-21GB at Q4
~225 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b
raw speed; ~12GB, long context
fit 24GB
All three
at Q4 — this is a VRAM game
The three-way split, decided for you
Coding & agents → Qwen3.6-27B (Q4_K_M, ~15-17GB). Best-in-class open coding model, leaves generous room for a big context window. The catch: it leans on chain-of-thought reasoning tokens, so it 'thinks' before it answers — accurate, not instant.
Vision & general use → Gemma 4 31B (Q4_K_M, ~18-21GB). Real multimodal image understanding and a higher general-composite score, but at ~18-21GB of weights your context headroom on a 24GB card gets tight — plan on reduced context or KV-cache quantization.
Speed & long documents → gpt-oss-20b (~12GB). OpenAI's open MoE runs about 225 tok/s on an RTX 4090 and leaves the most room for context. It won't match Qwen's coding ceiling, but for fast general work it's the one that feels instant.
VRAM footprint at Q4 (weights only — leave headroom for context)
most context headroom on 24GB
comfortable on 24GB
tight — watch your context length




